Sunday, April 25, 2010

Shape and Form

Today's discussion will be on shape and form and how it correlates to time and space. Let's analyze shape and how it coexists within space as a quantum of matter. Shapeless matter does not exist so shape is absolutely necessary for matter to exist. Since matter and space are largely intertwined, shape serves as an emblem of the illusion to make it work. We define shapes as basic - squares, rectangles, circles and more complex, human beings, leaves, shapes of animals, rocks; and synthetic shapes such as ceramics, electronics, batteries, medicine and miscellaneous objects. Consider this - not all material shapes require the presence of a mover. Alas, inanimate shapes are stationary. They are either fashioned by nature or human beings who mold shapes to benefit their material lives or fulfill a material necessity. The existence of inanimate shapes leads to a highly thoughtful consideration. Proof of the existence of an objective mover, supermover or God. The mere appearance of inanimate objects and shapes within the material universe is undeniable proof of the existence of God. The objects do not take shape on their own and seem to be compelled by an outside, immaterial force that produces these quantifiable, shapely phenomenon. Then, so why are some forms and shapes instilled with life? While all shapes may be biological, differing only in the amount of time that is needed to deconstruct and decompose the shape, why is a human being or an animal, infused with a spirit? Why also are other objects stationary and cannot be infused with a spirit? A container cannot get up and walk out of the building. But the shape of a leaf as an extension of nature does undergo drastic, natural changes as does animal life during the course of its spiritual voyage. While the presence of a spiritual mover on earth is awe-inspiring, it does lead to the larger question of a higher and more powerful supernatural force that moves all things, animate and inanimate alike. If we dismiss time as a relativity of space, we conclude that only the mover exists and thus all material life presents a subjective illusion. Only God remains eternal. What is the importance of shape? It seems that shape is only a facility to perform material obligations such as a leaf on a tree branch or water in the ocean. While water takes on the shape of its container, in and of itself, in it's most basic molecular composition, it is still bound to a specific shape. Why does a tree have branches? It seems that matter has an intelligent, shape-giving conscience. The tree grows leaves that are consistent with its material needs and human beings give birth to other human beings that possess the shape of an eye, ear, lips, organs and extremities. The shape of the lion or tiger for example is also conducive to its predatory nature. The alligator's teeth are sharp for a reason. Thus, we conclude that matter as a proponent of shape and form, is intelligible (in a derogatory sense) based on the a priori rule. The a priori rule in this case, should be redefined as an all priori rule since time is demoted, thus proving the existence of an omnipotent God. Since matter is immaterial and form or shape is a relativity of matter, we must wonder what part of the divine buffet is eternal. Obviously, the mover fulfilling material obligations becomes a servant of God and as a result, gains everlasting life or paradise by performing material actions that it would otherwise not be bound. If matter is an illusion, is the shape or ephemeral outline of matter as it relates to this super conscience invisible and visible. If we dismiss matter altogether, does form or shape prevail within the eternal, grand design. That also seems unlikely since one is essential for the other but does offer a rationale for infinite, immaterial obligations fulfilled by the finite capacity of matter. Can form exist without matter? Can the mover exist without matter? We realize the mover can exist without matter since the mover is primary. Can the mover exist without form? Also true, since form is a relativity of a material want or need and seems to be visible and invisible. What is eternal life when the mover is free from matter and shape? It seems to enter a super conscience that governs all existence and exists for the sake of or not the sake of material, transitory life. Finally, the finiteness of matter and form, and the biological parting from material life through old age, sickness or decay is merely a corroboration of material facts that seem to say that "we are eternal and materially contradictory". Why? It seems more more that matter and shape are merely doors to an eternal universe, that time unlocks to reveal the glory that resides beyond the material threshold.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Movement . . .

Let's begin today by discussing movement. Movement can be defined as the mover's penetration through time and space as a material entity. Movement seems to exist only as a material matter of course. The mover's right to shift from one position to another only exists by way of its material state. There are several forces at play. For movement to exist, we must gauge the amount of time it might take for the material entity to act, the consumption of space as it moves in a desired direction, and finally the intent of the mover to proceed at will. Further, the mover will never act against its will unless a material anomaly exists such as a debilitating disease or duress. Even then the consciousness of the mover remains constant. Is the mover invincible? We conclude in the affirmative since the mover's will is ultimately affected by its material relationship to its environment. The human condition can be largely understood by the paradigm of movement. The movers will to seek peace, wage war, fight hunger and starvation, procreate and raise civilizations is dependable on movement like Carl Jung's collective unconsciousness. Is the mover ultimately good? We cannot say for certain but one thing is true, the mover as a material entity, is quite compromised by its material state. Why - mainly, because it is an everlasting, infinite thing. However, the mover and matter are complementary. The mover will never deliberately cause harm to its material state and its main goal is to prolong its material life by a matter of course. This is quite a testy state of being. Without the movers existence, matter is ultimately, disowned. The material need is transitory so why is movement important. We define movement as an aggregate fulfillment of material obligations that the mover performs as a result of its material existence or for matter, a singular, micro obligation. Think of parents, siblings, friends, colleagues and acquaintances. It is ultimately their movement that is important to us. What they do is more important that what they are? A movement can be highly desirable or deleterious to material livelihood. Thus, we differentiate between material actions and laws and ethics are invoked. Why must the mover act and what governs its movement? Obviously, the need to fulfill material obligations is foremost? The mother who does not care for her young may not want to see her offspring die and thus must act in a positive, sustainable way. Her movement and material relationship to her offspring and vice versa creates a symbolic, worldly action or good. This prism, while shaped by a material interaction is highly dependable on the everlasting mover. Otherwise, matter would be inert and lifeless. The material motion picture, so to speak, is also transitory and governed by the value of time and will ultimately fade like a material memory or vision. Can the mover remember or does matter remember? Is memory a neurological, physical impulse. We cannot know but we know that the two are highly complementary and will act in tandem. However, the mover must prevail since memory is only a material aphrodisiac. Thus, the mover seems more intelligible. The action or movement becomes the summum bonum and the mover's existence in the material universe is thereby, fulfilled. Why move in the first place? The movement that ensues has severe material repercussions. For example, the lion hunting the gazelle, will create a great deal of material duress like the oxygen we breathe. But alas, this is secondary for the lion as a material entity who must fulfill such a material obligation by way of its makeup. The impact that this movement causes is highly material. The mover only lifts the lever or pushes the button. Why? The mover acting in a material realm to fulfill material obligations, when time and space are not essential to its livelihood, is highly irrational. Thus, matter becomes illusory and the movement is primary. Does movement exist outside of matter or does it need to exist. The answer is plainly no since matter is essential for the movement to take place. Does the mover ultimately pass the material, transitory realm and gain infinite life that has no recourse to a three-dimensional world that as material agents, we are compelled to serve. That seems more like the case and we conclude that the mover is transcendental. So, are our material actions also transcendental? Perhaps not, since the movement is not categorical from a material standpoint. The consideration of movement gives us much pause.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

The Soul

Now that we have deconstructed the material world to know its individual parts and how it coexists within space and time, let us focus on the soul. The soul or the mover is an essential component to material life. The soul is primary, and material secondary. Even while the material world may exist without the soul in a dormant, physical state, the soul by its mere existence is a primary obligation. Without the mover, matter will cease to exist or slowly perish. Can the earth exist without material life whence the earth is matter. One can reasonably contend that the earth too has a soul - and without a life giving soul, the earth too can perish as any other classification of matter. Other planets too have souls, though may be uninhabitable. Their mere existence implies that a mover may actually be present. Human life has a distinguishable mover. One that we can discern more palpably. The human mover can make decisions whereas nature or earth's soul is less intelligible or more volatile and spontaneous. Nature, however, seems to supersede the human mover and provides the environment for the human mover to exist and flourish in a material sense. Once again, a divine plan, seems to be at work. While earth's soul may far outlast the human mover, it is still finite in a material sense; thus, we perceive worldly goods as finite. The earth ages in material sense but nature remains constant. The seasons change with respect to the earth's position in the galaxy and juxtaposition to the sun and its radiance, and while the earth may age, nature in its natural course does not change. Light and water seem to be an essential component to all life and finally, matter is molded by these less tangible elements so the mover can exist. Consider for example when someone dies such as a loved one. The memory of the person affects us most and we feel the loss of the mover more than the actual, physical person. Photographs of that person may not give us the consolation that we deserve only because the mover cannot be truly known through a photograph or the objects or traces they leave behind. I am always nostalgic for the mover when I remember someone that has passed away in my life. While, material talents are necessary for the mover's life and works on earth, they are less distinguishable than the actual mover, who is highly individualistic. Consider transplanting a foreign soul into the body of a deceased whom we might know. We will immediately discern a difference. Thus, we beg the question, are all movers the same and defined by their material elements. Is transmigration of the soul possible or anthropomorphism? Can a tiger's soul transmigrate into a human body and exist as a human soul and vice versa. The answer may be metaphysical. Let us consider the three-dimensional aspects of the soul. In a finite material sense that is defined by time, the mover is three-dimensional and is bound to live in a one-dimensional world. The tiger, too, is a one-dimensional animal. While the tiger's soul is highly arbitrary and unique to its material needs, all tigers are not alike. Thus, the animal world is highly defensive. Each tiger protects its livelihood to prolong its material existence and preserve its soul. Thus, the tiger's soul is more driven by a strong animal instinct. For an animal soul to transmigrate into a human body, the laws of time, matter and space will be compromised. The same applies to the soul of a killer that may be transplanted into the body of an innocent person. That soul is still responsible for its former actions, debunking the theory of transmigration. Without the mover, matter is inert or lifeless. Even suicide requires the conviction of a mover. For the mover to exist in a material world that is capable of infinite material possibilities and highly illusory, the mover is an infinite, eternal reality that should not reenter the material realm once it transcends the material world. Moreover, the material world does not exist and only the mover is everlasting. This implies that each mover is responsible for its material actions and no others. To answer the question, we must consider the world in fatal, hyperbolic sense. For transmigration to occur, the material world must be infinite, which is dismissed by the value of time. Thus, the mover is one and only and part of an eternal realm that does not recycle itself to a finite existence once it has completed its material journey. It is simply not possible or universally fathomable. Thus, as matter, we often live our material lives as paper planes traveling on a one-dimensional axis. However, our flight is dependable on a three-dimensional force that is all-encompassing. We conclude that the soul is eternal, individualistic and everlasting.